crackyhouse imgboard /r/esources #/r/ on irc.efnet.net stickam succubus updates deadgirls rar the video diary of ricardo lopez




The Wall

Connect to server...



[Burichan] [Chaus] [Futaba] [Gurochan] [Photon] - [Home]

Name
Link
Subject
Comment
File
Password (for post and file deletion)
Leave empty (spam trap):
Crackle Christmas

No.1   [Reply]

An Appeal To My Fellow Christians

It's possible (and it's my dearest hope) that I'm missing the tone of super-dry 4chan irony in all this (dear CHRIST let it all be ironical!). But I can't help feeling that even irony might be getting out of hand when the name of a 50-year-old gentleman of sedentary habits recurs obsessively in five of the seven threads on the first page of Crackyhouse, not to mention on the torso of some young individual who, regardless of who he may or may not be, clearly isn't Zooey Deschanel or Thora Birch, which is the only way something like that WOULDN'T scare the shit out of me.

The idea that I might be the object of erotic - or even, as appears to be the case here, of only vaguely eroticized - attention from the side of a young FEMALE individual is already an idea I have a bit of a problem with. That, admittedly, is a personal sexual pathology of mine that I've had to learn to live with. As regards my becoming the object of the quasi-erotic fixations of young MALES, however, I consider it imperative, at this point, to publicly declare that I am entirely of one mind and will with my fellow Mexican Lizard Cardinal Javier Barragan - I don't think he's Jewish - who is today reported in the press as reiterating, to the dismay and consternation of many, what is, however, after all no more and no less than the plain text and matter of Holy Scripture: namely, that homosexuality is a sin against the dignity of the body, and precludes its practitioners from ever entering the kingdom of Heaven.

Cardinal Barrigan cites the Letters of St. Paul. He might have gone on to cite countless other passages from both Old and New Testaments. Such as the passage in Kings 22:11, for example (one of my favorites) where Jehovah speaks from a somersaulting mountain and decrees that "the one manner holy in the sight of the Lord in which a man shall offer up the longing and adoration of his soul and his body to another" shall be

(i) to a woman (a girl's okay too; in fact, anything over 12's permissible in periods of drought, famine, or other personal difficulties)

and

(ii) via regular Paypal money-transfers accompanied by brief and usually unanswered messages begging the woman/girl/babe-in-arms in question to reveal to the adoring individual the exact angle in which she was penetrated by her boyfriend the night before and the approximate (preferably somewhat exaggerated) dimensions of the latter's penis.

Certain so-called "progressive" theologians have been at pains for years to effectively neutralize the meaning and effect of this key scriptural passage by quibbling over whether the original Aramaic - rendered into English in the King James Version of 1632 as "a moving tabernacle that shall carry the fruit of the toil of the desiring one, yea, and of all his labor" - really can fairly and accurately be interpreted to the contemporary world as Paypal Ltd. or some equivalent fast-and-easy cash-transfer service.

Such pedantic liberal nitpicking, however, is powerless to alter the fact that Divine Revelation itself has laid down these forms and these forms alone as the forms of the expression of erotic love which the Lord has looked upon and found to be good. And indeed, does not the natural instinct of the common man, even in his ignorance, suffice in itself to teach him what scripture here imparts to the learned? Is this common man not - to invoke a passage from Paul's "Letter to the Romans" the original sense of which has become distorted and even reversed in modern speech - already a "law unto himself" in these matters? Do not his deepest natural inclinations go in the very direction prescribed to him by Jehovah's words in "Kings"?

I appeal to you, therefore, my brethren, stray not from the appointed path, however great the temptation placed in your way. And please let there be no misunderstanding here. I wish to adopt no superior or holier-than-thou attitude in this matter. My own glance, I won't deny it, has strayed as often as yours has, irresistibly, on misty autumn evenings, toward some grotesquely overweight, deathly pale, wheezing and obviously insane 50-year-old Irishman who happened to pass, like a breath of promised spring, across my path on my way home from work. They really are delightful little teases, that type - but perils, for all that, for the immmortal souls of each and every one of you!

So go now in peace and absolution - and sin no more.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
38 posts and 2 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.40  

>>39

So to sum up your post, you are alex and op isn't?

>> No.41  

Yes. The last one wasn't actually a bad attempt at mocking the way I write. But I hope that no one is actually taking this "homosexual" stuff seriously (above all not the young man or men who appear to have taken to writing my name all over their body (what is this? fucking Stickam?)) If I have a sexual interest in "the male principle", it's solely and entirely as an element in a ritualistic psychological relation to a desired female - as at present to RavRav - and men almost certainly wouldn't play even this very secondary and subordinate role in my sexual life if I felt that there were any real possibility of my taking on the role of "the male principle" vis-à-vis my loved one myself.

>> No.42  

>>41
The funny thing is I actually am gay for the author of Alex Reynolds posts.

Buck is so dreamy

>> No.43  

Well, that's your right. But also, in my opinion, your private and personal business that doesn't really need to intrude on this board.

Without wanting to draw any actual comparison between myself and a writer whose shoes I would not have been fit to lace, I'll point out that allusion has been made once or twice, in connection with my posts, to some passages in James Joyce. The notorious fifteenth chapter of "Ulysses", in particular, touches on several of the sort of themes that appear to be giving rise to misinterpretation here.

There cannot be the least doubt that the central and even the sole essential object of sexual desire throughout the whole of Joyce's novel is a woman: the magnificent Molly Bloom, whose monologue of love and infidelity ends the whole book. The moving patterns of deflected and distorted libido that Leopold Bloom's frustrated and tormented love for his wife Molly sets in motion, however, do, in this sixteenth chapter, make transvestism, fantasies of anal rape by Molly's lover, and other prima facie strongly homosexual activities a central part of the action. Only an idiot, however, would seriously claim that Leopold Bloom is a homosexual (he is one of the great lovers of women in literary history).

If you happen to be an American, the whole point at issue here was actually pretty well clarified by one of your judges, Judge John M. Woolsey, as long ago as 1933, when the U.S. Customs Authority tried to have "Ulysses" banned from the United States as a pornographic publication. Woolsey concluded that "while in many places the effect of the book on the reader is undoubtedly somewhat emetic, nowhere does it tend to be aphrodisiac."

Actually, I have my doubts about whether Judge Woolsey had the right to generalize like that. The fifteenth and other chapters of "Ulysses" probably HAVE been used as an aphrodisiac over the years by many readers. But he was right, I think, as far as Joyce's INTENTION was concerned. Joyce TRIED, at least, to present in this book material that might, in itself, be apt to establish a very intimate, sexual relation between the writer and the person reading it in a way that DIDN'T establish any such relation, that deliberately avoided establishing it.

I assure you I've tried to do the same, and to avoid the very same thing, in my posts. I don't want anybody to be "gay" for me or for what I write, just to find it either "emetic", or amusing, or intellectually interesting.

Believe me, if alluding here in WORDS to my masochistic-voyeuristic-homosexual relationship to RavRav and her boyfriend were in fact one and the same thing with LIVING OUT this relationship, you would all definitely know and notice that, and the atmosphere generated by my posts would definitely be a very different one. And indeed it's theoretically conceivable that one of the cold, cruel, destructive commands I might fantasize about the beautiful dominatrix RavRav giving me would be: "Go on Crackyhouse and tell everybody exactly what you've been begging me to do to you; let everybody see and mock your shame."

But it would never ever enter my head to do such a thing. It would be an utterly tasteless misuse of this place, and I'd feel a shame about doing such a thing a hundred times deeper and more serious than the fantasized and secretly pleasurable shame of any masochistic games I might play.

I can't help feeling that your talk about being "gay" for people and finding other people "dreamy" amounts to moving some way, at least, in the direction of such a misuse, and of incurring such a shame. As I understand it, at least, expression of that kind of unreflected, all-too-real and all-too-genuinely-expectant desire even for Cracky, or for one of her avatars such as Lia or RavRav, is inappropriate here. This is not about desire, or its fulfilment. It's about something else.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>> No.44  

TL;DR



File: 1259877080795.jpg -(26608 B, 636x432) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
26608 No.1   [Reply]

David Lynch
Alex Reynolds
Inland Empire

My reflection shows that i'm far too critical.

Textbook Diamonds.

1 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.3  

you have a better body than i expected buck

>> No.4  

Enjoy the fact that Bell is posting as Alex and you just camwhored for Bell.

>> No.5  

Inland empireeee

>> No.6  

>>5
Meth capitol of Cali

>> No.7  

I got the impression from the movie that it was somewhere in Poland.

And put some clothes on, for Christ's sake!



File: 1259869386718.jpg -(93289 B, 1000x810) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
93289 No.1   [Reply]

The Sigma is Smith and Wesson’s initial foray into the world of polymer body automatic handguns, and it is a line that has been fraught with hiccups. In 1994 the series was introduced as a Glock 17/19 knockoff, and brought many of the good features of those venerable workhorses to the table. Early models of the sigma, however, were rife with reliability issues, giving the Sigma a fairly poor name starting off, and earning the namesake “Slocks”, implying that they were a cheap knockoff of the genuine trusted Glock auto pistol. Smith and Wesson has, since that time revamped the pistol, adding several valuable features to the gun, and bringing it in line in quality with a Glock pistol.

Today we’re going to be looking at the SW9VE, which is the newest Sigma chambered for 9mm Parabellum. I chose the 9mm because it’s arguably the most popular handgun/home defense round in the world today, and because the 9mm version of this gun is in direct competition with the Glock 19 compact, the gun from which it gets most of its cues.
Smith and Wesson based the Sigma off of a high strength, light weight polymer body, which cuts down on weight significantly. The slide is stainless steel, which lends the gun an attractive two tone scheme which works nicely. This is the only color offering that S&W offers for the gun, so it’s a good thing it looks as good as it does. The first thing one notices about the body, and the slide especially is how similar it is to a Glock’s. This holds true for almost every piece of the gun, which in my opinion is definitely a good thing. The sights are standard three dot, and they work pretty nicely. The Sigma, just like the Glock, does not feature any sort of external safety, but comes with a Glock style trigger safety, ensuring that errant brushes will not discharge the weapon. The safety is a bit different in design than the Glock’s, in that there are not two separate pieces to the trigger. Pulling the trigger back slightly will disengage the safety, without having to worry about pulling the extra protruding trigger that Glocks are famous for. An interesting point about the trigger is the pull strength on it. The Sigma features a very tight trigger, both in part because of its dual action only operation, and the fact that S&W implemented a very tight trigger spring. The pull on the trigger is almost 10 pounds, which puts it at almost twice the trigger pull as the Glock. This is important for two reasons. Firstly, a strong trigger pull can help with safety immensely, it protects from light brushes discharging the weapon, and makes it more difficult for children to use it, however on the other side, a tight trigger means less accuracy, unless you are very familiar with the weapon. I would recommend taking the pistol to a gun shop and lightening the trigger a bit, or accuracy will definitely suffer. The construction of the weapon is either on par, or superior to a Glock in many ways. S&W incorporates stainless steel magazines instead of the polymer magazines standard with the Glock, and heavy duty slide and internal construction lend the weapon a solid feel. The reliability of this weapon is also phenomenal, with very few reports of jams or misfires, apart from user error.
All in all, the Smith and Wesson Sigma 9mm is an impressive, reliable, and powerful personal defense pistol at a fraction of the price of a comparable Glock. The weapon would serve anyone well for many years, and with a reduced power trigger spring, becomes an accurate and deadly handgun for any situation.
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 1259796001824.jpg -(56204 B, 500x333) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
56204 No.1   [Reply]

http://rapidshare.com/files/315450904/Alex.mp3.html

I've made us a song Alex.

The world will always be ours.

4 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.6  

>>1

lol.

>> No.7  

This is an experiment in seeing whether even someone of my advanced age and limited computer-literacy can successfully bring a new online acronym into circulation:

tpet;wliypmtd

"Too personally existentially terrifying; wouldn't listen if you paid me a thousand dollars"

>> No.9  

Cracky wants you to listen;
as does curiosity.

>> No.10  

>>7
You have a problem when even your acronyms are tl;dr
Also listen to it, the worst it can do is drive you mad.



File: 1259794382439.png -(80680 B, 363x347) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
80680 No.1   [Reply]
>> No.2  

hi



File: 1259596645634.jpg -(262473 B, 850x850) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
262473 No.1   [Reply]

Olivia I would sleep with your corpse.

>> No.2  

i would not

>> No.3  

Already did. Shit was so cash, if a little clammy.

>> No.4  
File: 1259698141834.jpg -(273043 B, 829x768) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
273043
>> No.5  

link made me daw



No.1   [Reply]
>happy
>married


File: 1259104471518.jpg -(229079 B, 850x1070) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
229079 No.1   [Reply]

I think it's funny when people complain super loud about how 'hipsters ruined' this or that as though if hipsters would just go away the problem is solved and you can go back to wearing plaid shirts too or something. Because I mean, directionless youths have always appropriated things and made them annoying! You have it easy, oh reader! The Beats had walking caricatures to deal with and Goethe had suicidal poet dandies on his doorstep.

52 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
>> No.54  

>>53
no, people here are hateful, you being one of the most hateful of us all

>> No.55  
File: 1259579569213.jpg -(7694 B, 247x235) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
7694

>>53
So basically Ravs shows up says you are acting like a dick and your plan to impress her by being the would be troll king of crackyhouse failed spectacularly and now you pretty much have shown yourself to be a bitter borderline insane old flapping asshole who can attention whore with the best of them.

Gotcha Bro

>> No.56  

>>53
I’ve seen enough. Congratulations, you are on your way to Saint status in the Cracky community. You are clearly a danger to the general community. By the gods. I think I’m stupider for talking to you. Stupider? More Stupid? Get them out of my sight, all of them! They may all have this disease of the mind.

>> No.57  

I posted 48 and 52... and now he's gone? I like to think I did that. Internet self hi-five.

(YES ALEX I KNOW I DIDNT ACTUALLY CAUSE YOU TO LEAVE WE ALL KNOW YOURE STILL READING THE SITE NO NEED TO RESPOND JOKE JOKE WAKKA WAKKA)



File: 1259590047921.jpg -(39738 B, 614x470) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
39738 No.1   [Reply]
>> No.2  
File: 1259590243502.jpg -(64282 B, 581x580) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
64282
>> No.3  

pikaq



File: 1259448295144.jpg -(217582 B, 1280x1024) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
217582 No.1   [Reply]

http://pledgie.com/campaigns/5569

lol



Delete Post []
Password
[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39]